Peptide Glow Journal

COSRX The 6 Peptide Skin Booster Serum: The Count Is Right, and One of the Six Is a Collagen

Six peptide-class ingredients, exactly as the name says — and they run from 403 daltons to 99,369. Two clear the penetration threshold; one has no published literature under its own name.

Fiona G · Edited by Caroline S · Published 2026-09-16

Illustration: Six polished pebbles of varying sizes on a rose-beige silk cloth, lit by natural light.
Illustration

Product names carrying a number invite a count, and counts usually go badly. This one does not. COSRX declares forty-four ingredients, and exactly six of them are peptide-class, sitting in an unbroken run at positions seven to twelve.

That is the uninteresting part, and it had to be checked first. The interesting part is what those six turn out to be.

The six

Pos. Ingredient (INCI) Sold or known as Molecular weight PubMed records
7 Acetyl Hexapeptide-8 Argireline 887.0 g/mol 50
8 Copper Tripeptide-1 GHK-Cu 402.9 g/mol 188
9 sh-Polypeptide-121 HumaColl21 (human type XXI collagen) 99,369 Da 0
10 Dipeptide Diaminobutyroyl Benzylamide Diacetate SYN-AKE 495.6 g/mol 1
11 Oligopeptide-68 1,410.5 g/mol 2
12 Palmitoyl Tripeptide-8 695.9 g/mol 5

Weights from PubChem and UniProt, counts through NCBI E-utilities, all read 2026-09-16. The copper and Argireline figures match those already published on our skin-peptide evidence page, which is the point of using a public register: the numbers reproduce.

One word covering a 247-fold range

The bottom row of that table and the row above position 9 are separated by more than two orders of magnitude. Copper tripeptide-1 is 402.9 daltons. The human collagen chain that sh-polypeptide-121 copies is 99,369.

Chemistry generally uses peptide for short amino-acid chains and protein for long ones, with the conventional line drawn near fifty residues. sh-Polypeptide-121 is on the far side of that line by a wide margin — its supplier, Geltor, calls it biodesigned vegan human type 21 collagen, made by fermentation from a sequence based on human genetic information, and the reviewed human entry for collagen alpha-1(XXI), UniProt Q96P44, runs to 957 amino acids.

INCI naming is a register of ingredient identities, not a chemical taxonomy, so a collagen and a tripeptide can sit two lines apart under the same reader-facing word. Nothing on the package distinguishes them, and the arithmetic of why that matters is on our guide to reading a peptide ingredient list.

Two of six clear the penetration threshold, which is above the category norm

The 500-dalton rule holds that compounds much above 500 Da do not passively cross intact stratum corneum in useful amounts. It is a heuristic rather than a law — our skin-peptide page covers the cyclosporin work showing heavier molecules engineered to penetrate better — but it is the number this whole category argues with.

Two ingredients here are under it: copper tripeptide-1 at 402.9 and the SYN-AKE peptide at 495.6. For comparison, the common cosmetic peptides catalogued across this site — palmitoyl tripeptide-1 at 578.8, palmitoyl pentapeptide-4 at 802.1, acetyl hexapeptide-8 at 887.0, acetyl octapeptide-3 at 1,075.2 — are all above it. Most peptide products contain none of the two exceptions, or one. This formula contains both.

That is a statement about molecular weight and nothing more. It is not evidence that anything reached a dermis, which no ingredient list can show.

Where the research is, and where it is not

The six split sharply. Copper tripeptide-1 and acetyl hexapeptide-8 carry essentially the whole file: 188 and 50 records. Both already have evidence entries here — copper peptides and Argireline — and both entries are about how much less those numbers prove than they look, since the copper literature is dominated by laboratory work and reviews written by a company selling the ingredient.

The other four total eight records between them. Palmitoyl tripeptide-8 has 5, oligopeptide-68 has 2, SYN-AKE has 1, and sh-polypeptide-121 has none under its INCI name. Geltor states that HumaColl21's efficacy is supported by in vitro and third-party clinical study results; those are not in the indexed literature, so a reader cannot open them. A supplier's unpublished data is not a reason to doubt an ingredient. It is a reason to be precise about what is available to check, which here is nothing. The one placebo-controlled trial of the SYN-AKE peptide is in a journal PubMed does not index, which is why a record count understates it; the SYN-AKE entry reads that trial.

Two ways to miscount this label

Both are worth flagging because they push in opposite directions.

Counting up. Positions sixteen to twenty-one are serine, alanine, glycine, threonine, arginine and proline — free amino acids, not peptides. They are the monomers, listed individually, common in hydrating complexes. Add them and the count becomes twelve.

Counting by prefix. Polyquaternium-51 at position thirty-eight begins with poly and is not a peptide; it is a polymer that mimics a phospholipid, with 11 PubMed records under its own and its trade name. Pattern-matching on names would include it.

The brand's six is the correct six, which after a run of labels where the number in the name did not survive a count is a finding in itself.

What six names on a label add up to

It establishes an accurate product name, six peptide-class ingredients all at 1 percent or less, two of them below the penetration threshold most of the category fails, and a size range inside one bottle that runs from a tripeptide to a collagen. It establishes that two of the six carry nearly all the published research and four carry almost none.

It does not establish what the serum does to skin. We have not used it, and a list of ingredients cannot answer that question for any product.

The same brand's four-peptide hydrogel eye patch reads very differently on the same test: its peptide count also holds up, but all four sit in the last quarter of a 41-name list, below a vitamin, a nucleoside and a stimulant with larger published files than any of them.

Sources

  • COSRX, The 6 Peptide Skin Booster Serum — published ingredient declaration, ingredient listing, read 2026-09-16.
  • PubChem compound records read 2026-09-16: CID 71587772, CID 71587328, CID 71465152, CID 163285842, CID 11498521.
  • UniProtKB Q96P44, Collagen alpha-1(XXI) chain, Homo sapiens, reviewed — UniProt, 957 residues, 99,369 Da, read 2026-09-16.
  • Geltor, HumaColl21 supplier page — Knowde, read 2026-09-16.
  • PubMed record counts via NCBI E-utilities, run 2026-09-16.
  • Bos JD, Meinardi MMHM. The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Exp Dermatol 2000 — PubMed 10839713.

Frequently asked questions

Does the serum really contain six peptides?

Yes, on the label it does. Six peptide-class ingredients are declared at consecutive positions seven to twelve: acetyl hexapeptide-8, copper tripeptide-1, sh-polypeptide-121, dipeptide diaminobutyroyl benzylamide diacetate, oligopeptide-68 and palmitoyl tripeptide-8. Product names with a number in them frequently do not survive a count of the ingredient list; this one does, and that is worth saying plainly.

What are the six, in plain terms?

Acetyl hexapeptide-8 is the molecule marketed as Argireline. Copper tripeptide-1 is the INCI name for GHK-Cu. Dipeptide diaminobutyroyl benzylamide diacetate is sold as SYN-AKE, a synthetic tripeptide modelled on a viper-venom peptide. Oligopeptide-68 is a pigmentation-pathway peptide. Palmitoyl tripeptide-8 is an anti-irritancy peptide. And sh-polypeptide-121 is not a small peptide at all — it is a fermented biotechnological human collagen, sold under the trade name HumaColl21.

How big is the size difference between them?

About 247-fold. Copper tripeptide-1 is 402.9 g/mol; the human collagen chain that sh-polypeptide-121 copies is 99,369 daltons in its reviewed UniProt entry. The other four fall between 495.6 and 1,410.5 g/mol. Chemistry usually reserves the word peptide for short amino-acid chains and calls longer ones proteins, at a conventional boundary near fifty residues. INCI naming is a register rather than a classification, so all six arrive at the reader under one word.

Does any of them cross the skin?

Two of the six are below the 500-dalton threshold that the standard penetration heuristic uses: copper tripeptide-1 at 402.9 and the SYN-AKE peptide at 495.6. That is unusual — most peptide products contain no ingredient under that line, or one. The threshold is a heuristic and not a law, and formulation can work against it, as our skin-peptide page explains; but on the raw arithmetic this formula has more of its actives on the favourable side of it than the category norm.

What is sh-Polypeptide-121?

A recombinant human collagen made by fermentation, which its supplier Geltor describes as biodesigned vegan human type 21 collagen and sells as HumaColl21. It is produced by a micro-organism from a sequence based on human genetic information, and contains no human or animal material. Under its INCI name it returns zero PubMed records. The supplier states that efficacy is supported by in vitro and third-party clinical results; those results are not published in the indexed literature, so there is nothing for a reader to open and check.

Are the amino acids in the list peptides too?

No, and this is where a count can go wrong in the other direction. Positions sixteen to twenty-one are serine, alanine, glycine, threonine, arginine and proline — individual amino acids, the building blocks from which peptides are made, not chains. Polyquaternium-51 at position thirty-eight is also not a peptide despite the prefix; it is a polymer that mimics a phospholipid. Counting by whether a name looks peptide-ish would give a different and wrong number in both directions.

Has Peptide Glow Journal tested this serum?

No. This page compares a published ingredient list against published research and molecular records. We assess a product only after six weeks of split-face use on real skin by two testers, photographed to a fixed standard, and that has not happened here. Nothing on this page says whether the finished product works, and a formula cannot answer that question.